Schumacher's wife Corrina BANNED me from visiting him, reveals his close friend Eddie Jordan. Luke Shaw lost his head and nearly cost Englandįemale athletes warned Seb Coe there was 'absolutely NO way' transgender athletes who have transitioned after puberty could be allowed to compete PLAYER RATINGS: Jude Bellingham was the star man in Naples and Harry Kane earned his redemption Why is the Premier League star facing rape and assault claims still allowed to play? Critics say they are 'complicit in minimising' violence against women REVEALED: Julian Nagelsmann is on a skiing holiday in Austria and was only informed of his Bayern Munich sacking last night SAMI MOKBEL: England can't rely on Harry Kane forever. They are in dreamland - much like too many of their viewers beyond 11pm - if they believe Match of the Day will forever be protected by its cherished status. It is time for the BBC to wake up and realise, among many things, that their flagship sports show has not evolved. But look at the elephant, guys, he’s fast asleep. But you can’t really say that, can you? Now there is an irony, given the cause of this whole furore in the first place. He’s not short of an opinion.ĭuring the outpouring of love for Match of the Day over the weekend, the elephant in the room was that the show is in need of reform. Make Gary Lineker part of that, instead of just a witty link-man. Give us the games and goals from the outset and then relax into a more informal debate. For me, they, too, are handicapped by the format - here is every match and every goal, guys, and you’ve got 30 seconds to tell us something about each of them. The BBC’s stable of pundits are more than capable - listen to them on radio or the excellent podcast series they produce. To be blunt, much more like Sky’s Monday Night Football, or even BT Sport’s Champions League Tonight, another show which rattles along with energy and insight. Let that content run, give it space to breathe. Pick a more nuanced subject, or even a wider one, and tell us why, not how. The challenge should be, again borrowing newspaper parlance, to return the sort of verdict you would read on Monday’s pages. Do we really need this from every game, having already watched the match package and replays? It is that repetition which induces fatigue. Producers clip up the key moments - invariably goals and chances - and we relive them with the help of a pundit's voiceover. “These AI seem like harmless fun but they are predatory and intend to replace artists,” voice artist Jenny Yokobori wrote in a Twitter thread.The BBC's flagship sports show hasn't evolved enough over the years and is in need of reformĪt present, Match of the Day’s analysis, in newspaper speak, is like that of a Sunday edition match report - it’s all headers and volleys. One artist tweeted that AI art generators are “fundamentally anti-creator.” Now they’re afraid it could put their careers in jeopardy. Sometimes artists use AI art tools to inspire them and to help them visualize their next creative project. “We also believe that the growing accessibility of AI-powered tools would only make man-made art in its creative excellence more valued and appreciated, since any industrialization brings more value to handcrafted works.” “As cinema didn’t kill theater and accounting software hasn’t eradicated the profession, AI won’t replace artists but can become a great assisting tool,” Prisma Labs wrote in a tweet. Prisma Labs CEO Andrey Usoltsev told BuzzFeed News that what Lensa generates “can never be described as exact replicas of any particular artwork.” He said the app creates images from scratch without borrowing existing pieces of art. Uploading your photos to Lensa gives the company access to your face dataĪs with many of the photo-altering apps that have gone viral in recent years, users are concerned about how much data Lensa retains about them once they submit their photos. Here are some of the reasons why people are concerned about the impact AI art generators might have on users and artists. But it’s not the rarity of having to pay to participate in a meme that has people worried. You’ve gotta pay up front - $7.99 for 50 pictures, up from $3.99 just a few days ago. The app, created by photo-editing tech company Prisma Labs, uses artificial intelligence and photos uploaded by the user to generate unique images based on their likeness. But as people share digital portraits of themselves created with the app Lensa, some experts have raised concerns about data privacy, artist rights, and how the app seems preoccupied with giving huge boobs to every woman who uses it. This week Instagram is swarming with artsy illustrations of your friends suddenly looking like a watercolor painting from the Impressionist movement or a character from a new Marvel film.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |